Author Topic: suspicion : Bunny (WH 65%) - 18/02/2021  (Read 252 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline -toxicjesus-

  • Silver Elite
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Karma: +4/-0
    • View Profile
suspicion : Bunny (WH 65%) - 18/02/2021
« on: 19 February 2021, 02:36:22 »
Hi,

I have a doubt with the "Bunny" player. I think he's using a WH but i'm not sure. (Only 65 % for me)

I find these preshot to be extremely fast. When did you think?

Demo : http://rus-server.com/demos/18680


Offline Aszriel

  • Silver Elite Master
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
  • Email
Re: suspicion : Bunny (WH 65%) - 18/02/2021
« Reply #1 on: 19 February 2021, 02:57:33 »
I don't think she's cheating at all.

I didn't watch the demo but I already know who the person is, and nothing really shocked me when I played against her.
Also when you post a demo, precise at which moment you find something suspicious, so which round with eventually the approximate moment(you can see by pressing SHIFT+F2, it will open the menu to fast forward, go back, etc. and you have the tick or time.

It would help anyone who want to watch the demo  ;D

I think most people know bunny for quite a while here. It doesn't necessarily mean that we can rule out any suspicion, but if you have some round or specific time on the demo you think are odd, I'll watch it and give you my opinion.

Offline SlyBesker

  • Global Moderator
  • Supreme Master
  • *
  • Posts: 75
  • Karma: +7/-0
    • View Profile
  • Email
Re: suspicion : Bunny (WH 65%) - 18/02/2021
« Reply #2 on: 19 February 2021, 08:11:37 »
Sometimes I was watching about 10 demos (8*) to get proof that guy is cheating.
And sometime the guy, a friend that I trusted, that i was never expecting to be cheating, just turned on cheat in-game when I was just spectating him after my death (or had it turned on always).
That's just from my experience.
As for demo, in my opinion she's not using something. Yes she has really good reaction, and there were few suspicious moments but it's happening to all of us and as for me she doesn't act like a cheater, cheaters act a little bit different. + there were few moments that prove that she has no wallhack.
So I also don't think she's cheating but... you never can't be 100% sure.

Offline xHAarRd

  • Admin
  • Gold Nova I
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
  • Email
Re: suspicion : Bunny (WH 65%) - 18/02/2021
« Reply #3 on: 19 February 2021, 10:09:29 »
no

Offline SilverFN

  • Admin
  • Gold Nova I
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: suspicion : Bunny (WH 65%) - 18/02/2021
« Reply #4 on: 19 February 2021, 16:41:41 »
65% isnt near enough, maybe a 90% then make a post... and no shes not hacking.
Who controls the past controls the future; Who controls the present controls the past.

Offline Knarran

  • Gold Nova II
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: suspicion : Bunny (WH 65%) - 18/02/2021
« Reply #5 on: 19 February 2021, 17:05:38 »
SilverFN even IF its 65% i think its enough to have someone else opinion. In this case he was wrong which we could conclude but i Encourage THE effort for trying keeping THE server clean

I mean Next Times he spots a suspicious player maybe he just let it pass.

Offline -toxicjesus-

  • Silver Elite
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Karma: +4/-0
    • View Profile
Re: suspicion : Bunny (WH 65%) - 18/02/2021
« Reply #6 on: 20 February 2021, 11:01:24 »
Hi,

I think SilverFN is right. Is better to report from 90%, because I think you can never be sure that a person is really cheating. There will be nothing worse than ban a guy (or girl ^^) which not cheating and what may be very lucky or very skilled.

Offline focusbtw.

  • Silver IV
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • focustop
    • View Profile
  • Email
Re: suspicion : Bunny (WH 65%) - 18/02/2021
« Reply #7 on: 20 February 2021, 17:26:05 »
Hi.
I agree with toxicjesus, because sometimes I myself get very lucky, and I myself kill as if I were playing with a wallhack or aimbot.
« Last Edit: 20 February 2021, 17:27:45 by focusbtw. »